Our second natures
“Custom is second nature” said Saint Augustine. But towards what kind of “second nature” are we going with captology, the science of digital attention?
“Custom is second nature” said Saint Augustine. But towards what kind of “second nature” are we going with captology, the science of digital attention?
A daring parallel brings us back to Babylonian times. Do our algorithms play a role comparable to the old clay tablets?
Invitation to follow the submarine cables with the artist Trevor Paglen and to explore the geography of the economic interests that they draw.
Can neurosciences and mathematics offer us a mechanizable vision of consciousness? In any case, researchers are actively seeking.
As the horizon of “intelligent” machines is autonomy, the question of their “ethics” is raised. Let’s follow Stuart Russell, AI researcher, on this topic.
Following Mumford, relayed by Aldous Huxley, the philosopher Jacques Ellul developed a deep and always vivid thought about our technical world.
Liu Hui, 3rd century Chinese mathematician, overcame one of the first mathematical “monsters”: the irrational number.
Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater investment fund, suggests a “radical” mechanization of management experience.
We gladly provide our measurements to the “Big Calculator”, even if this narcissistic desire is accompanied by anxiety.
The “body” of Alan Turing, precursor of computer science and artificial intelligence, has been “invited” in his research, even the most abstract